During a recent interview, we explored the implications of UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy’s visit to China, which marks the first such visit by a British foreign minister in six years. This trip comes after years of tense relations between the UK and China, particularly following issues related to the Hong Kong protests, human rights, and allegations of espionage.
Many analysts are noting that despite this engagement, the Labour Party, which currently governs the UK, is not perceived as a strong political force. They suggest that the Labour government seeks to address both domestic and international pressures through economic cooperation with China, aiming to establish a better communication mechanism. However, they caution that this visit should not be seen as a pivotal shift in UK policy towards China, and full normalization of relations remains unlikely.
According to Wang Yiwei, a professor of international relations at Renmin University of China, this visit reflects the Labour Party’s intention to collaborate with China in areas such as renewable energy, climate change, and attracting Chinese investment. By improving UK-China relations, the government hopes to reap economic benefits that could ease the pressure of geopolitical tensions.
Lammy emphasized the need for “frank communication” between the two nations prior to his departure. In diplomatic terms, “frank communication” suggests that while there may be disagreements, it is crucial to converse and engage constructively. Analysts anticipate that Lammy will continue to press China on issues such as the Ukraine conflict and human rights.
Additionally, Li Guanjie, a researcher at Shanghai Foreign Studies University, remarked that Lammy’s visit is aimed at establishing a more “normal” communication channel and is an opportunity for the UK government to connect with China. He views economic cooperation as a strategic entry point but reiterates that this does not represent a fundamental shift in UK policy toward China; the potential for a significant turnaround in relations still remains to be seen.
Li Bin, director of the Academic Committee at Fudan University’s China Institute, shared similar sentiments, observing that while there are signs of thawing relations, complete normalization is unlikely. He pointed out that the UK is currently facing financial challenges and is opting to enhance economic ties with China to stimulate growth. Nonetheless, he expects the UK to maintain its critical stance on issues such as Taiwan and the Ukraine conflict, typical of Western governments.
Dong Yifan, an associate researcher at the Institute of European Studies at the China Contemporary International Relations Research Institute, highlighted the pragmatism of the Labour government in handling relations with China. He noted that Prime Minister Keir Starmer has made it clear that the UK wishes to maintain dialogue with China while prioritizing national interests. This strategy recognizes that despite significant differences, collaboration between the two countries on global challenges like climate change and energy security is essential. Lammy’s visit is expected to focus on these issues, especially in today’s increasingly uncertain global landscape, as he aims to bolster the UK’s influence in international affairs through dialogue.
